We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
Is the Subsea 7-Saipem Combination Too Powerful for Brazil?
Read MoreHide Full Article
Key Takeaways
Brazil's operators warn that the Subsea 7-Saipem merger could alter pricing and project dynamics.
Petroleum groups argue that Saipem 7 might dominate SURF work due to control of key deepwater vessels.
Cade is gathering global input as Brazil becomes the pivotal arena for the merger's approval.
The proposed merger between Subsea 7 S.A. ((SUBCY - Free Report) ) and Saipem SpA has sparked a rare unified response from Brazil’s major oil operators, who warn that the deal could reshape competition in one of the world’s most important deepwater markets. The combined entity — tentatively dubbed “Saipem7” — would become a subsea engineering giant with a €43 billion backlog, around €21 billion in annual revenues, and more than €2 billion in core earnings. While the scale appears efficient on paper, clients worry it could give one contractor too much influence.
Brazil’s Industry Raises Concerns
Brazil’s oil industry group IBP, representing operators such as Petrobras ((PBR - Free Report) ), ExxonMobil ((XOM - Free Report) ) and TotalEnergies ((TTE - Free Report) ), submitted a formal warning to antitrust regulator Cade. The group argued that the merged Subsea 7–Saipem company could push up project costs, slow execution and pressure clients into exclusive, long-term agreements. Cade responded by requesting additional data, saying crucial information was missing from the initial filings. Subsea 7 and Saipem told regulators they are cooperating fully, but industry concerns remain high.
Competitive Pressure in SURF and Adjacent Markets
The strongest objections focus on the subsea umbilicals, risers and flowlines (SURF) segment, where only a few players operate on a global scale. French multinational TotalEnergies submitted its own analysis, arguing that no remedy would fully offset the competitive risks posed by Saipem7. The Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) company noted that the merged group would control eight of the 12 vessels worldwide capable of executing the most complex deepwater SURF work.
American energy behemoth ExxonMobil raised similar concerns, while Brazil’s state-run energy giant Petrobras and oilfield services provider TechnipFMC requested a full antitrust review months earlier. Operators fear that if one firm controls most high-spec capacity, costs will rise and scheduling flexibility will shrink. Total also cautioned that Saipem7 could dominate fast-growing segments like offshore wind and decommissioning, further concentrating market influence.
Cade’s Deliberate Approach
Cade is proceeding methodically, seeking input from local operators and coordinating with regulators in the U.S., U.K. and Mozambique. Although the U.K. has already approved the merger, Brazil remains the key battleground. Subsea 7 CEO John Evans stated on Nov. 20 that the deal is still expected to close in the second half of 2026 and that Cade’s measured pace is in line with expectations. Even so, the level of scrutiny signals how significant this case is for competition in a sector critical to Brazil’s economy.
Conclusion
The likes of Petrobras, ExxonMobil and TotalEnergies are effectively drawing a line, warning that consolidating two major contractors into one global powerhouse could reshape pricing, timelines and strategic control across its deepwater market. With substantial economic weight behind the combined entity, regulators must choose between allowing efficiencies from scale or preserving competition in a capacity-constrained sector. Cade’s eventual ruling will determine not just the fate of the Subsea 7–Saipem merger but also the broader direction of Brazil’s offshore future.
See More Zacks Research for These Tickers
Normally $25 each - click below to receive one report FREE:
Image: Bigstock
Is the Subsea 7-Saipem Combination Too Powerful for Brazil?
Key Takeaways
The proposed merger between Subsea 7 S.A. ((SUBCY - Free Report) ) and Saipem SpA has sparked a rare unified response from Brazil’s major oil operators, who warn that the deal could reshape competition in one of the world’s most important deepwater markets. The combined entity — tentatively dubbed “Saipem7” — would become a subsea engineering giant with a €43 billion backlog, around €21 billion in annual revenues, and more than €2 billion in core earnings. While the scale appears efficient on paper, clients worry it could give one contractor too much influence.
Brazil’s Industry Raises Concerns
Brazil’s oil industry group IBP, representing operators such as Petrobras ((PBR - Free Report) ), ExxonMobil ((XOM - Free Report) ) and TotalEnergies ((TTE - Free Report) ), submitted a formal warning to antitrust regulator Cade. The group argued that the merged Subsea 7–Saipem company could push up project costs, slow execution and pressure clients into exclusive, long-term agreements. Cade responded by requesting additional data, saying crucial information was missing from the initial filings. Subsea 7 and Saipem told regulators they are cooperating fully, but industry concerns remain high.
Competitive Pressure in SURF and Adjacent Markets
The strongest objections focus on the subsea umbilicals, risers and flowlines (SURF) segment, where only a few players operate on a global scale. French multinational TotalEnergies submitted its own analysis, arguing that no remedy would fully offset the competitive risks posed by Saipem7. The Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) company noted that the merged group would control eight of the 12 vessels worldwide capable of executing the most complex deepwater SURF work.
You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
American energy behemoth ExxonMobil raised similar concerns, while Brazil’s state-run energy giant Petrobras and oilfield services provider TechnipFMC requested a full antitrust review months earlier. Operators fear that if one firm controls most high-spec capacity, costs will rise and scheduling flexibility will shrink. Total also cautioned that Saipem7 could dominate fast-growing segments like offshore wind and decommissioning, further concentrating market influence.
Cade’s Deliberate Approach
Cade is proceeding methodically, seeking input from local operators and coordinating with regulators in the U.S., U.K. and Mozambique. Although the U.K. has already approved the merger, Brazil remains the key battleground. Subsea 7 CEO John Evans stated on Nov. 20 that the deal is still expected to close in the second half of 2026 and that Cade’s measured pace is in line with expectations. Even so, the level of scrutiny signals how significant this case is for competition in a sector critical to Brazil’s economy.
Conclusion
The likes of Petrobras, ExxonMobil and TotalEnergies are effectively drawing a line, warning that consolidating two major contractors into one global powerhouse could reshape pricing, timelines and strategic control across its deepwater market. With substantial economic weight behind the combined entity, regulators must choose between allowing efficiencies from scale or preserving competition in a capacity-constrained sector. Cade’s eventual ruling will determine not just the fate of the Subsea 7–Saipem merger but also the broader direction of Brazil’s offshore future.